code ai

AI at Work Without Leaking the Company

Somebody has handed you "sort out our AI policy". Your staff are already using these tools on personal accounts with company data, and have been for months. This segment gets you from that position to three artefacts you can put in front of a director: a one-page acceptable-use policy that is true today, a data-class table, and a vendor question set.

  • trending_upIntermediate
  • schedule6h 56m
  • menu_book12 节课程
  • publicEnglish
  • workspace_premiumBasic
AI at Work Without Leaking the Company

课程概述

The request arrives with no budget and no scope. It lands on the security lead, the IT lead, or on whoever in the company has actually read a set of terms all the way through. That is usually you. The first thing to accept is that you are not at the start. You are somewhere in the middle. People in your company have been pasting work into chat windows on personal accounts since long before anyone asked whether they should, and the question in front of you is not whether to allow it. It is what is already leaving, on which accounts, under which terms, and what you are going to do about it this month. Across four modules you will run a discovery that tells you what is actually in use rather than what you assume, work out precisely what leaves the building when somebody pastes, build an approved tool set short enough that people follow it, learn to test a vendor's retention and training claims instead of accepting them, sort your company's data into three classes concrete enough to print on one page, and decide which decisions in your organisation may never be handed to a machine — and how you would prove a human actually looked. The method for the policy itself is borrowed wholesale from the compliance segment, B1, and it is the same rule for the same reason: write the policy to the state you are actually in today, then improve it. An aspirational AI policy is a signed, dated description of your own non-compliance, and it is worse than having no policy at all. Segment A1, AI Without the Hype, covers how the tool works and the personal habit of redacting before you paste. This segment does not repeat either. It is the organisational version: the controls, the written evidence, and the accountability when work produced this way goes out under your company's name. **This is not legal advice.** Where UK GDPR or the EU AI Act touch what you are doing, this segment describes the direction those obligations point in and stops there. Your data protection officer and your lawyer decide the rest, and the sentence "our security lead read a course" has never once helped anybody in a regulatory conversation.

课程大纲 · 4 个模块

lock解锁权限内容
  1. 01 It Is Already Happening
    3 节课程·1h 46m

    You do not have a decision to make about whether to allow this. That decision was made months ago by about forty people independently, none of whom told you. Your first job is to find out what they…

  2. 02 Tools, Vendors and Written Controls
    3 节课程·1h 36m

    A ban list is a list of things to route around. Every name you add to it makes the list less likely to be read and more likely to be treated as a challenge. The control that works is the short list…

  3. 03 What May Be Pasted, and What May Go Out
    3 节课程·1h 31m

    A rule that requires judgement at the moment of pasting is not a rule. It is a hope. This module produces a table somebody can read in four seconds while holding a customer's file.

  4. 04 The Policy, the Human, and the First Hour
    3 节课程·2h 3m

    The rule is borrowed from B1 and it does not change because the subject is AI. Write the policy to the state you are actually in today. Then improve it, and change the page on the day the work lands.

常见问题

我将在 AI at Work Without Leaking the Company 中学到什么?
Somebody has handed you "sort out our AI policy". Your staff are already using these tools on personal accounts with company data, and have been for months. This segment gets you from that position to three artefacts you can put in front of a director: a one-page acceptable-use policy that is true t
我需要有先前的经验吗?
建议在开始 AI at Work Without Leaking the Company 前具有一定的先前知识。
AI at Work Without Leaking the Company 需要多长时间?
AI at Work Without Leaking the Company 包含 4 个模块和 12 节课程。您可以按自己的速度学习。
我如何获得访问权限?
AI at Work Without Leaking the Company 包含在任何付费订阅中。

更多 编程 课程

Binary, Hex and Data Units
Beginner Binary, Hex and Data Units The topic that costs more marks than any other on the paper, taught by hand. Bits and bytes, binary and hex in all six directions, the 1000-versus-1024 trap, file sizes, transmission times, overflow, two's complement and character sets. Every module ends in a timed drill marked the way an examiner marks it.
First Program — Scratch for ages 5–9
Beginner First Program — Scratch for ages 5–9 Nine Scratch blocks, three sessions of about twenty-five minutes, and one small program a child of five to nine builds themselves. Written for the parent sitting beside them: what to click, what they will get stuck on, what to say when it goes wrong, and when to keep your hands off the mouse.
AI Without the Hype
Beginner AI Without the Hype 模型在回答你时实际上在做什么,为什么这会产生看起来像思考的东西,为什么它编造引文,以及几乎没有人解释的成本机制:每一轮聊天都会重新发送整个对话。你将自己做算术。
从空白开始学 Python
Beginner 从空白开始学 Python 九位学生已经走过的确切步骤,从空白文件到一个能提问、检查答案并拒绝错误输入的程序。无需编程基础。无需数学。你会故意反复出错。
IGCSE 和 GCSE 计算机科学 — 实际会得分的理论
Intermediate IGCSE 和 GCSE 计算机科学 — 实际会得分的理论 论文的理论部分,按能通过考试的方式教授。内存层级和启动时实际发生的事情。编译器、解释器和汇编器,包括听起来对但得零分的答案。从电子表格到键和规范化的数据库。DNS 和从按下 Enter 到看到页面的完整路径。系统软件,以及是试卷上最容易得十分的伦理和法律部分。
Programming for the Exam — Python Answers That Score
Intermediate Programming for the Exam — Python Answers That Score The programming half of the paper, taught at exam pitch. Pseudocode translated both ways, because the mark scheme is written in a notation nobody practises. Trace tables done column by column, including the ones with a loop and a condition inside it. Linear and binary search, bubble and insertion sort, what each costs and the comparison questions boards love. Validation against verification, and the boundary test data everybody forgets. Procedures against functions, and a systematic method for finding your own error with four minutes left.